An all-male supreme court in Iowa just agreed that if a man gets a bulge in his pants in a workplace, whatever attractive women is in any near vicinity can be fired so as not to continue to ‘cause‘ said bulge and so this situation does not “threaten his marriage“. Thus, the female employee was made fully responsible for the male’s behavior (or potential behavior), and even for his marriage — but she damned well has no jurisdiction over her own body in this country. There is only one person in this particular situation who could do anything to “threaten his marriage“, and that was the man himself, not his employee. Yet she was the one who lost her job – all because this man could not deal with or control himself. It’s pretty sad for both of them, actually. And it’s pretty damn sexist.
- Let’s Talk About JOBS.
- The kind of woman who needs a late-term abortion – Washington Post
- “Grow Your Own Marrow Donor” Ethics and Consequentialism: The Ayala Family Saga | Ethics Alarms
- ‘Creepy Uncle Sam’ Gives Pelvic Exam in Obamacare Attack Ad | Central Oregon Coast NOW
- My Son Wears Dresses; Get Over It – Matt Duron – The Atlantic
Catherine Dream on I Don’t Shave | Paloma… Jef With One F on The Mythological Christianity… Charlie Adams In Ken… on Is Facebook Now Officially a F… asdffasd on the anti-reproductive rights m… Aoife O'Riordan on Blog for Choice Day 2013: Why…